WHEREAS it seemed clear that the decision of the Cort pü inalt in April 2016 which resolved the "Proclamation Crisis" and the subsequent adoption of the current text of Article XV of the OrgLaw had sorted out whether an Organic Law amendment must be "proclaimed" or "promulgated" to take effect;
and WHEREAS a recently withdrawn lawsuit, and the orders made by one CpI justice in the course of that lawsuit, and the subsequent ill-tempered threads on Wittenberg have shown that the above is surely not the case;
and WHEREAS this sort of tomfoolery should never happen again:
BE IT ENACTED by the King, Cosâ and Senäts of Talossa in Ziu assented and by the consent of the people in referendum that the text of Article XV, Section 4 of the Organic Law be amended by the addition of the following text in red:
After approval by the Ziu in accordance with the preceding sections, a proposed amendment shall be submitted to the people in a referendum. If the King objected to the proposed amendment under the preceding section, a statement of his objections not exceeding one hundred and fifty words shall be provided to the people along with the proposed amendment. The amendment shall take effect, and the King shall promulgate the amendment as part of this Organic Law, if it is approved by a majority of voters participating in a referendum on the question of the amendment no later than during the next scheduled general election following the approval of the Ziu, except as provided in the following sections.
Noi urent q'estadra så,
Dame Miestră Schivă (MC-FreeDems)
Sir Lüc da Schir (Senator-BE)
Magniloqueu Épiqeu da Lhiun (Senator-MM)
Sir Ian Plätschisch (MC)
Mximo Carbonel (MC)